|
||||||
| Log-in/register to unlock all the member quick-links and features! |
 |
 Senior Member
 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,631
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRRoger
They are both going to require expensive Pro quality glass to get the best images.
Don't just go by specs. Canon tends to overstate their cameras abilities while Nikon understates theirs.
The D700 has more than twice the high ISO capability.
The 5D2 can produce a better picture up to ISO 1600, above that the D700 easily wins.
The D700 is much easier to use and more forgiving of user error due to lower pixel count, better focusing, presets, and ergonomics.
However, I expect that the user is fairly proficient in the Canon system after "outgrowing" a 350D.
I suggest that he get his "hands on" both cameras before deciding.
Don't just go by specs. Canon tends to overstate their cameras abilities while Nikon understates theirs.
The D700 has more than twice the high ISO capability.
The 5D2 can produce a better picture up to ISO 1600, above that the D700 easily wins.
The D700 is much easier to use and more forgiving of user error due to lower pixel count, better focusing, presets, and ergonomics.
However, I expect that the user is fairly proficient in the Canon system after "outgrowing" a 350D.
I suggest that he get his "hands on" both cameras before deciding.
|
Senior Member
 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: east sussex
Posts: 3,484
|
There are, as well known, two basic camps-Canon and Nikon, both are as good as each other. It usually comes down to a couple of things, using a make your used to,or how a camera feels in the hand. Nikon owners swear by Nikon as do Canon owners swear by Canon. At the end of the day apart from slightly different specs there really is very little difference in the final picture. The biggest difference is the tog behind the lens.
Bazza
Bazza
 Junior Member
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Monterey Bay, California
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazza
There are, as well known, two basic camps-Canon and Nikon, both are as good as each other. It usually comes down to a couple of things, using a make your used to,or how a camera feels in the hand. Nikon owners swear by Nikon as do Canon owners swear by Canon. At the end of the day apart from slightly different specs there really is very little difference in the final picture. The biggest difference is the tog behind the lens.
Bazza
Bazza
I am sure glad that there are a lot of camera systems to choose from. The price and performance competition among all Camera Brands is very good for the consumer.
I've decided that different people are meant for different systems. I think it may be genetic as both of my sons were nearly instantly proficient with my Nikon D2h, D2x, and D3 cameras.
I just got a 5D2 and am finding it very hard to use but will endure the learning curve as I am not willing to wait for a D700x that may never be built nor can I afford the D3x for trips and hikes.
So, go try before you buy. Find what will work for you before you plunk down your hard earned dollars.
|
Kit 1 Nikon D3 Nikkor 80-400 Nikkor 14-24 Nikkor 28-70 Nikkor 70-200 Nikkor 50 f/1.8 Nikkor 85 f/1.4 AF-S TC17eII AF-S TC20eII |
Kit 2 Nikon D90 AF-S Nikkor 18-200 VR Nikkor 12-24 Nikkor 18-35 Nikkor 70-300 VR N-AF 1.5X TELEPLUS MC DG KENKO |
Other Kit View my profile to see my other kit! |
 Admin Team
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 15,385
 |
Post some photos in the forums Roger - would be nice to see some of your recent work 
|
Kit 1 Nikon D300 Nikon 55-200mm VR |
Kit 2 Nikon D40 Nikon 18-55mm |
|
|
My Compact/P&S: Panasonic Lumix TZ7 |