Yo Photographer
Register for FREE!
Go Back   Photography Forum > General Photography Forums > Photography Talk


Log-in/register to unlock all the member quick-links and features!
Reply


kcjack
Senior Member
kcjack is offline
kcjack is Female
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 121
 
04-05-09, 01:06 AM
#1

Advice

I took these pics on the aperture setting and as the woods dark the ISO sensitivity was 1600.
They ok but would like them better more crisp if you get my meaning.
What does the ISO actually do as in if bright day what would you want and dark woods what would be best.
What setting would you use as I can never get good pics in woods. I just had a play around and tried to find best setting.
Thanks guys





     
DaisyChains's Avatar
DaisyChains
Senior Member
DaisyChains is offline
DaisyChains is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 4,033
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
04-05-09, 01:45 AM
#2

Re: Advice

Hey KC - instead of explaining ISO again, take a look at the following guide - it has all the info you need But i will say you really dont need such a high ISO value for daytime photography!!

http://www.yophotographer.com/page.php?t=58

The sharpness of your image and the quality will have a little something to do with your ISO as this is the trade off with using higher values. To add to this, your choice of lens will impact the final image directly as far as sharpness is concerned - some are better than others


Asfor asking for what kind of setting - well thats like asking how long a piece of string is - Photography is down to interpretation and the variables in the particular envirmoent your shooting.

A good starting point is the "Sunny 16" rule. Start with you camera on the following setting :

Aperture: F16
Shutter: 1/200
ISO: - to match shutter speed as closely as poss - so in this instance 200




HTH


     
BlackCloud's Avatar
BlackCloud
Senior Member
BlackCloud is offline
BlackCloud is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Posts: 2,133
Comments/Critique welcome
 
04-05-09, 07:32 AM
#3

Re: Advice

Shame about the ISO etc. as that second picture is quite nice and it could look so much better, possibly with a hint of golden or warmer sunlight had been taken in the early morning or evening. I'd actually go back to that scene with a tripod!

DC has linked to an explanation. I haven't read it but would guess it explains something like as we increase ISO, the apparent sensitivity of the camera image sensor increases. It gives us more flexibility because if it is more sensitive we can now use faster shutter speeds or smaller apertures. It means we can photograph in lower light and no need for a tripod or freeze action.

If we can do all that then we have to ask, why isn't the camera more sensitive in the first place and no need for all this messing? Well if we think of it a bit like our portable radio or hifi system at home. If we turn up the volume do we get to hear it any clearer? The answer is yes to a degree. It can get better - so think of this optimal level as the point where you camera is set as 'normal' when it comes from the factory, probably ISO100 or 200 . But when the amplifier starts to overload the speakers the sound gets distorted and fuzzy, it's loud but the sound is distorted. The portable radio (akin to a compact camera with a small sensor) distorts quite quickly as it gets louder, the bigger hifi (a DSLR with bigger sensor) copes with a bigger sound and takes longer to get distorted but it distorts when we get up to a high volume. So by increasing the ISO we make the sensor seem more sensitive by amplifying the light signal. However, the trade off is it soon gets distorted, overloaded and loses quality and ability to aticulate the true signal it is processing. The result is the fuzziness and grain, inability to render colours properly, hot spot pixels etc.

I'm not clear what camera you are using, but on a compact ISO250 is probably the highest ISO that is useable without noise noticeably starting to degrade an image, and a current starter DSLR probably around ISO400/640. Individual taste and objectives will determine what is acceptable but ISO1600 would be unusual.

That wood picture I would have thought could have been taken at ISO 200 maybe using a tree as support in the absence of a tripod. If you were trying to get the dogs in action shots then yes, can understand why ISO1600 would seem necessary.

Hope that helps.
Kit 1
Nikon D700
Nikon 28-70 f2.8 ED AF-S (The Beast)
Nikon 80-200mm f2.8
Tamron 24-135 SP
Nikon 300mm f4
Nikon 70-300mm VR
Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 (DX)
Nikon 28-105mm (great walkaround on D700!)
Lensbaby Composer
Nikon 20-35mm f2.8
Nikon SB800
Kit 2
Nikon D300
Nikon 20mm f2.8
Nikon 24mm f2.8
Nikon 28mm f2.8
Nikon 35mm f2
Nikon 50mm f1.4
Nikon 85mm f1.8
Micro-Nikon 60mm f2.8
Micro-Nikon 105mm f2.8
Tamron 28-75mm f2.8


     
kcjack
Senior Member
kcjack is offline
kcjack is Female
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 121
 
04-05-09, 02:22 PM
#4

Re: Advice

Thanks guys going to make some time for me and my camera and start playing with some settings.


     
Zoundz's Avatar
Zoundz
Senior Member
Zoundz is offline
Zoundz is Female
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: West Cork, Ireland
Posts: 7,578
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
06-05-09, 12:34 AM
#5

Re: Advice

Excellent replies above. Just wanted to say I rather like the second one anyway!

xx
Kit 1
Nikon D800
Nikkor 50mm f1.4
Nikkor 24-70mm f2.8
Nikkor 105 mm f2.8 macro
Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8
Sigma 50-500mm F4-6.3 EX DG HSM
Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Nikon 70-300mm AF f/4-5.6G
Nikon 50mm f1.8
Kit 2
Nikon D700
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Fuji finepix bridge


     
Reply

Top


© Copyright 2008, Yo Photographer   Yo Photographer | Contact Us | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top