Yo Photographer
Register for FREE!
Go Back   Photography Forum > General Photography Forums > Photography Talk


Log-in/register to unlock all the member quick-links and features!
Reply


jols's Avatar
jols
Senior Member
jols is offline
jols is Female
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Posts: 5,071
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
11-06-08, 07:49 PM
#1

Tamron AF 55-200mm

Tamron AF 55-200mm F4.5-5.6 Di II LD Macro Nikon


is this worth a shot.

it wont auto focus on the d40

will it fit on the d40x [and i assume still not focus?]

i have seen a used nearly new one on amazon for 35.00

whay do you think?
LENSBABY


     
Moonstone
Senior Member
Moonstone is offline
Moonstone is Female
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: uk/usa
Posts: 10,146
 
11-06-08, 07:56 PM
#2

Re: Tamron AF 55-200mm

You have gone lens crazy missus.

Have to be honest I was looking at two lenses that I really want, well there are three, but one is alot more expensive. But I also want a really good tripod, and some lights and a flash and ........


     
DaisyChains's Avatar
DaisyChains
Senior Member
DaisyChains is offline
DaisyChains is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 4,033
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
11-06-08, 08:08 PM
#3

Re: Tamron AF 55-200mm

I have the 70-300mm and to be honest - i really dont like it. The pic quality isnt great - athough this is something i do notice alot of when im looking at lenses Thebuild quality is on par with last weeks left overs. To top it off, it only stops down to i think F4, so i cant shoot at the longer range of the lens (unless its realy sunny) without getting vibration in my shots.

If its a 3rd part lens your looking at, id consider Sigma.

9/10 of ten, you get what you pay for when it comes to lenses. If its a cheap lens, its highly likely the results wont be what you hope for.


     
Azz's Avatar
Azz
Admin Team
Azz is offline
Azz is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 15,385
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
11-06-08, 09:00 PM
#4

Re: Tamron AF 55-200mm

I would spend a little extra and get the nIkon 55-200 VR tbh Jols - its a cracking lens for the money

Tamron are a pretty decent brand, but I've never heard anyone rant and rave about that particular lens.
Kit 1
Nikon D300
Nikon 55-200mm VR
Kit 2
Nikon D40
Nikon 18-55mm
My Compact/P&S: Panasonic Lumix TZ7


     
Bazza
Senior Member
Bazza is offline
Bazza is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: east sussex
Posts: 3,484
 
11-06-08, 09:44 PM
#5

Re: Tamron AF 55-200mm

KK

thats exactly why I changed to the VR version of the 70-300mm lens.

Bazza


     
samnooshka's Avatar
samnooshka
Senior Member
samnooshka is offline
samnooshka is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,880
 
11-06-08, 10:27 PM
#6

Re: Tamron AF 55-200mm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanikula View Post
I have the 70-300mm and to be honest - i really dont like it. The pic quality isnt great - athough this is something i do notice alot of when im looking at lenses Thebuild quality is on par with last weeks left overs. To top it off, it only stops down to i think F4, so i cant shoot at the longer range of the lens (unless its realy sunny) without getting vibration in my shots.
Agreed wholeheartedly! its crap on the Canon too well it has its place but i haven't used it since i got the 70-200mm.


     
Reply

Top


© Copyright 2008, Yo Photographer   Yo Photographer | Contact Us | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top