Yo Photographer
Register for FREE!
Go Back   Photography Forum > General Photography Forums > Photography Talk


Log-in/register to unlock all the member quick-links and features!
Reply
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >


nero's Avatar
nero
Senior Member
nero is offline
nero is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 855
 
15-09-07, 03:57 PM
#11

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

Some pics folks take are OK without any editing, but i'm sure most pics do need a bit contrast/brightness or cropping.
Kit 1
Canon 350D
Canon 18-55 f:3.5-5.6
Tamron 28-300 f:3.5-6.3
Sigma 28-200 f:3.5-5.6
Canon 28-80 f:3.5-5.6
canon 80-200 f:4.5-5.6
Kit 2
Canon 40D
Sigma 10 - 20 f:4.5
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Sony Mavica


     
Sue's Avatar
Sue
Member
Sue is offline
Sue is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Harrogate , North Yorkshire
Posts: 43
 
15-09-07, 06:32 PM
#12

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

I prefer to try & take the best pic i can & personally like a pic that hasn't had much done to it. I like to look at a photo i took & it to look like what i saw when i took it.

But then sometimes a little tweeking here & there does wonders for some photos, it all depends on what the photo is i suppose . I have just had a tweek with a pic i took of my friends nephew & it is much better now then the orginal, so for things like that it is good, but for others i like to leave them alone .

i do think though that ps is good & i would like it but i will still prefer the more natural photo.
Kit 1
Canon EOS 20D
Canon EF 18-55mm
Canon EF 28-135mm IS


     
Wolfie's Avatar
Wolfie
Senior Member
Wolfie is offline
Wolfie is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 319
 
15-09-07, 08:11 PM
#13

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

I prefer to produce photo's that don't need any editing other than re-sizing (for internet use)

Sometimes though, I've taken a bit of a dodgy pic, but I know it would look great after editing. Sometimes it works, other times it looks worse


     
suey's Avatar
suey
Member
suey is offline
suey is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Shropshire UK
Posts: 55
 
22-09-07, 08:48 PM
#14

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

I am very new to digital photography as I was a film die-hard but it's onwards and upwards and I am really hungry to learn I would love to play around with images I have 2 problems time and money at the moment we are spending an awful lot on the house and the daughter so we have to watch our p''s and Q's so these threads are lovely to read and I hope I can achieve eventually 1/2 as good a print as lot's of you are achieving (I wish)...Also very new to computers so lunging around in the dark lots hehe...
Sue
Kit 1
Canon 400d
Sigma 18-200 os lens
Canon 18-55 kit lens
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: FujiF70EXR


     
thandi
Member
thandi is offline
thandi is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: east sussex uk
Posts: 34
 
23-09-07, 03:00 PM
#15

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

I much prefer photos to be as natural as possible....or at least look natural.

Some 'improvements' I have seen, appear too have the opposite effect, and can actually spoil the subject matter, rather than enhance it.
This is of course only my personal opinion, and just cos it doesnt appeal to me doesnt mean there is anything worng with it


     
caddette77
Member
caddette77 is offline
caddette77 is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 74
 
24-09-07, 02:17 AM
#16

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

I like both but to a degree you use post editing techniques with film too the old burning and dodging in the red light room(lol) I love that process but times move on, I always try to get exposure etc right on everything and framing etc but sometimes playing around in photoshop (when I get time) is so much fun
Kit 1
Canon D20


     
Dawn's Avatar
Dawn
Senior Member
Dawn is offline
Dawn is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,631
Comments/Critique welcome
 
24-09-07, 10:27 AM
#17

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

I dont care for PP, I dont use photoshop much (although I do like some of the effects I have seen on here) I just like photos how they come. The mst I usually do is a bit of cropping and sharpening sometimes.

I agree with you all, personal choice.
Dawn.
Kit 1
Canon EOS 7D
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Canon 100-400mm L IS USM.
Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 macro
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG MACRO HSM II.
Giottos Pro Monopod. MML 3270B.
Canon BG-E7 grip.


     
nero's Avatar
nero
Senior Member
nero is offline
nero is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 855
 
25-09-07, 03:14 PM
#18

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

Quote:
Originally Posted by caddette77 View Post
I like both but to a degree you use post editing techniques with film too the old burning and dodging in the red light room(lol) I love that process but times move on, I always try to get exposure etc right on everything and framing etc but sometimes playing around in photoshop (when I get time) is so much fun
Post proccessing has went on since pics were take over a hundred years ago, in the darkroom you always adjusted contrast etc, what I don't like is the over-manipulating of pics to give "artistic" effects.
I do play around with PS, but only as an experimental exercise to see how the pic would look, sometimes you get the odd eysore in a landscape, with PS you can edit it out and finish up with a really nice pic.
Kit 1
Canon 350D
Canon 18-55 f:3.5-5.6
Tamron 28-300 f:3.5-6.3
Sigma 28-200 f:3.5-5.6
Canon 28-80 f:3.5-5.6
canon 80-200 f:4.5-5.6
Kit 2
Canon 40D
Sigma 10 - 20 f:4.5
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Sony Mavica


     
Manguish's Avatar
Manguish
Senior Member
Manguish is offline
Manguish is Male
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 357
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
08-10-07, 09:07 PM
#19

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

I'm 50/50.

I only use PS to double check and resize if required. Sometimes levels - curves.

I like to think my photos can come out "au natural" but i'll edit them if needs be.

I like to play with photos too to see what can be created.
Kit 1
Nikon D80
Nikkor AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR
Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 ED VR
Sigma 20mm f/1.8 EX DG ASPHERICAL RF
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Macro DG
Sigma 24-70mm f2.8
Nikon SB600
My Compact/P&S: Sony DSC-T200


     
cymruchris's Avatar
cymruchris
Senior Member
cymruchris is offline
cymruchris is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London,UK
Posts: 515
 
08-10-07, 09:48 PM
#20

Re: Photographers vs Post Processors

I think there's a time and a place for both options. I like natural untouched photographs, but the odd photoshop effect is quite interesting... I also agree that sometimes it gets overdone to a point where I think it does spoil a picture...

You can always add an effect - it's harder to take it away once everything is saved... Unless you're looking for a specific effect - don't do too much!!
Kit 1
Canon EOS 40D
Canon 10-22mm EFS
Canon 17-85mm EFS
Canon 70-300mm DO EF
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Canon Ixus 850


     
Reply
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

Top


© Copyright 2008, Yo Photographer   Yo Photographer | Contact Us | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top