Yo Photographer
Register for FREE!
Go Back   Photography Forum > General Photography Forums > Photography Talk


Log-in/register to unlock all the member quick-links and features!
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >


SteveL's Avatar
SteveL
Senior Member
SteveL is offline
SteveL is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 984
Comments/Critique welcome
 
07-07-11, 06:45 AM
#1

Is the newest equipment always necessary?

This article is a year old now but, to my mind, is still very relevant today. Do we all rush blindly on trying to upgrade our equipment in the hope the brand new model will somehow make our photos better?


WDYT



With all the talk out there from Nikon, Canon and Sony about high resolution and high quality, high ISO performance it’s easy to get caught up in the race to buy new equipment. There have been countless times that I’ve wondered if I should upgrade my 5D to the 5D mkII or the D700, that’s actually what spurred this article. So with that in mind I wanted to take a step back from the constant push to upgrade cameras and always have the newest and the best to see what I’m really missing.



To me before you upgrade any equipment you own you should be asking yourself alot of questions. For me these three have been a good starting point, they make the decision less about want and more about need.
  • What shot will this new camera get me that my current one won’t?
  • Will X or Y feature lead to more sales or more assignments?
  • WIll I take more photos because of it?
But looking at the forums on the internet I see lots of people asking about upgrading their cameras thinking that and that alone lead to better pictures. Looking at my purchases and really asking what has made me better at photography I can honestly say it’s not the camera I’m using now or the camera I was using before. Some lenses have made my shots better, and on occasion I’ve gotten the shot because my lens was fast or my camera nailed the exposure. But those are the rare cases, with modern cameras you can count on your hands the occasions you’ve had where you’ve needed a 1Ds or D3 vs the camera you already own. All current DSLR’s are great at taking photos, you don’t get a huge advantage with one camera body over another for most shots.
I know there are pros and some amateurs out there shooting things where these cameras are necessary, I don’t doubt the uses of these cameras, I just doubt them in the context of every day shooting. Can you honestly tell me that you need to upgrade your perfectly good X or Y DSLR to a new high powered one to shoot the family portrait or the candid of your kids, the evening sunset? I didn’t think so, it just does not make sense to be spending thousands on cameras for use cases where hundreds can do just as well.
Back to the title of this article, is the Canon 5D still good enough in today’s world of the 5D MkII and the numerous other cameras in this category? As a whole I’d say yeah the Canon 5D is just as good of a camera today as it was when it was released 5 years ago. It still shoots pictures just as well as it did then and conceivably will for the next 5 years. So unless you absolutely have to have the latest and greatest, or a specific feature that your camera is missing put it off.
Rather then spending your money spend your time, invest in the time to take the pictures you have always hoped to take, invest in photographic education, in a vacation to take more photos. Do anything you can do to get out and actually take the pictures you’ve always dreamed of taking and don’t let your equipment slow you down.

http://www.knowphoto.com/2010/03/is-the-canon-5d-enough/


Steve
Kit 1
Canon 5D MkII
Canon24-105mm f4L IS USM
Canon 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Canon 17-40mm f4L USM
Canon 100mm f2.8 USM Macro
Canon 70-200 f4L USM
Canon MT-24EX Macro Flash
Kit 2
Canon 5D, Canon 40D, Canon 20D
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!


     
Skyline's Avatar
Skyline
Senior Member
Skyline is offline
Skyline is Male
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,053
Comments/Critique welcome
 
07-07-11, 08:45 AM
#2

Re: Is the newest equipment always necessary?

Great read.
Some people will always want the newest thing around. Mobile phones are a great example of this.
I do want to upgrade when I have the money to get first my DSLR. I've had my bridge camera for about a year and it has taught me a few good things. For me, personally, I'd like a camera with a lens that makes things like birds clear and sharp.


     
SteveL's Avatar
SteveL
Senior Member
SteveL is offline
SteveL is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 984
Comments/Critique welcome
 
07-07-11, 09:08 AM
#3

Re: Is the newest equipment always necessary?

I agree Skyline. There comes a time when an upgrade is desirable because it will give you better quality, more useful features etc. but we all fall into the trap of sometimes upgrading just for the sake of it, and I include myself in that

Steve
Kit 1
Canon 5D MkII
Canon24-105mm f4L IS USM
Canon 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Canon 17-40mm f4L USM
Canon 100mm f2.8 USM Macro
Canon 70-200 f4L USM
Canon MT-24EX Macro Flash
Kit 2
Canon 5D, Canon 40D, Canon 20D
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!


     
BlackCloud's Avatar
BlackCloud
Senior Member
BlackCloud is offline
BlackCloud is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Posts: 2,133
Comments/Critique welcome
 
07-07-11, 09:12 AM
#4

Re: Is the newest equipment always necessary?

You can't help but move on with some things as some technologies and the abilities of certain devices become obsolete. Cameras, well sensor technology is moving on... the latest sensors used on DSLRs are more foregiving than those of three or four years ago, with wider lattitude. However, there comes a point when you have to ask, do i really need more megapixels? My D300 and D700 are 'only' 12, but pro's were selling fantastic images from only 6 a few years ago, and there are plenty of weddings and full page advertisements done on Nikon 12MP sensors without anyone suggesting they are near the limit.

Times do move on but I wouldn't be looking to change my camera in the near future. New features, well often these just automate something that could be done anyway.
Kit 1
Nikon D700
Nikon 28-70 f2.8 ED AF-S (The Beast)
Nikon 80-200mm f2.8
Tamron 24-135 SP
Nikon 300mm f4
Nikon 70-300mm VR
Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 (DX)
Nikon 28-105mm (great walkaround on D700!)
Lensbaby Composer
Nikon 20-35mm f2.8
Nikon SB800
Kit 2
Nikon D300
Nikon 20mm f2.8
Nikon 24mm f2.8
Nikon 28mm f2.8
Nikon 35mm f2
Nikon 50mm f1.4
Nikon 85mm f1.8
Micro-Nikon 60mm f2.8
Micro-Nikon 105mm f2.8
Tamron 28-75mm f2.8


     
Cakey's Avatar
Cakey
Senior Member
Cakey is offline
Cakey is Male
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 3rd planet on the left
Posts: 2,418
 
07-07-11, 09:49 AM
#5

Re: Is the newest equipment always necessary?

Im ok until some one shows me their new camera and I want one
I throw all my toys out until I get it
I worked my way through a whole range of Canons new and secondhand
then one day while I was fishing a chap in the next swim showed me a Nikon D80 and I was blown away by the build quality and size this thing looked like a camera should.
so once home I was on the net looking for the cheapest and it turned out to be argos in Stevenage so over I went and purchased one.
two weeks later a mate phoned up who writes fishing books offered me a secondhand D200 that he had used just to illistrate his latest book ,so Cakey being Cakey thinks that camera must me the nuts to use the pictures in a book so I advertised the D80 and sold it for 50 quid more than the Argos price and brought the D200 .
then the git that sold me the D200 turns up at the next fishing do with a D300 and said "do me a favour Im in the match could you walk round and take pictures for me" ,well after a day with the 300 the 200 was out the window so it was swap around time again .
I managed to resist a year later when he turned up with a D700
cant see me losing the D300 for a while as I love it and think its better than sex hahahahahaha


     
Azz's Avatar
Azz
Admin Team
Azz is offline
Azz is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 15,385
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
07-07-11, 12:28 PM
#6

Re: Is the newest equipment always necessary?

I don't agree with getting a new camera just for more megapixels - I've always been happy with my D40's 6 - but I do think other features are worth getting, like the higher ISO abilities of the newer cameras. I guess you have to ask whether you want/need features of newer cameras
Kit 1
Nikon D300
Nikon 55-200mm VR
Kit 2
Nikon D40
Nikon 18-55mm
My Compact/P&S: Panasonic Lumix TZ7


     
Zoundz's Avatar
Zoundz
Senior Member
Zoundz is offline
Zoundz is Female
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: West Cork, Ireland
Posts: 7,578
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
07-07-11, 12:37 PM
#7

Re: Is the newest equipment always necessary?

I'm happy with what I've got - I did upgrade from the D80 and have never looked back, as I couldn't do a number of things I wanted to with it - the ISO performance was very poor - even the D300s is stretched on many things I want to do... but certainly, I was unable to upgrade lens due to financial things, and for one reason and another it made sense to upgrade the camera, which did improve the images somewhat. I have to say though, glass is what I'd be saving for!

xx
Kit 1
Nikon D800
Nikkor 50mm f1.4
Nikkor 24-70mm f2.8
Nikkor 105 mm f2.8 macro
Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8
Sigma 50-500mm F4-6.3 EX DG HSM
Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Nikon 70-300mm AF f/4-5.6G
Nikon 50mm f1.8
Kit 2
Nikon D700
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Fuji finepix bridge


     
Phil's Avatar
Phil
Fondly Remembered
Phil is offline
Phil is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perthshire Scotland
Posts: 8,168
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
07-07-11, 01:06 PM
#8

Re: Is the newest equipment always necessary?

Good article.

I use a Canon 40D and a Canon 1D Mark II both of which are a few years old.

I don't need more than 10MP so certainly no need to upgrade on that front but I do know for a fact that with better ISO performance I could use very fast shutter speeds for the birds in conditions other than great light.
Kit 1
Canon 1D Mark 3
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Kit 2
1D2 & 40D


     
Moonstone
Senior Member
Moonstone is offline
Moonstone is Female
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: uk/usa
Posts: 10,146
 
07-07-11, 02:50 PM
#9

Re: Is the newest equipment always necessary?

Good article

I think it's a temptation to want the latest, new shiney thing that comes on the market, especially when starting out, I went nuts, and then sold most of the stuff I bought within a year. Now I spend my money on glass, as cameras bodies change so frequently, quality glass stays the same, as long as you take care of it. I am happy with my camera, had it two years now, though I feel I am ready to upgrade, I'm in no rush.


     
Greenie
Senior Member
Greenie is offline
Greenie is Male
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Norfolk UK
Posts: 159
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
07-07-11, 09:43 PM
#10

Re: Is the newest equipment always necessary?

I have a thing about sharp images so to me it worth upgrading for the megapixels. Having just got the 600D I'm really happy with the IQ compared to my previous 400D & 450D. Not sure that I'll upgrade again for a while. A reason some people upgrade is because they didn't choose wisely in first place (I'm included in this) due to inexperience and budget and then after time want what they perceive to be the better product.

Paul
Kit 1
Canon 600D
Canon 24-105mm L
Canon 55-250mm
Canon 50mm f1.8 (Nifty Fifty)
Sigma 10-20mm
Sigma 28-70mm f2.8
Sigma 120-400mm
Kenko Extention tube set.
Canon 100mmf2.8 L IS USM
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Sony Cyber-shot


     
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Top
Forum Jump

© Copyright 2008, Yo Photographer   Yo Photographer | Contact Us | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top