|
||||||
| Log-in/register to unlock all the member quick-links and features! |
 |
 Fondly Remembered
 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perthshire Scotland
Posts: 8,168
 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanokella
My two penneth worth 
The 18-200 is a cracking lens, it being the lower end of the glass market from nikkor, sigma do a version for about half the price which will be about 80% of the quality, if you have one of the "0", D40, D60 etc range then it is the perfect lens.
If you are looking at a D200 or D300 which are pro camera's then you should be looking at pro level glass, otherwise you are wasting your money on the pro level camera as the better results it can produce over the "0" range camera's is lost by using the lesser quality glass.
If you wanna spend money spend it on the glass as that is what will give you the better results not the body.
The 18-200 is a cracking lens, it being the lower end of the glass market from nikkor, sigma do a version for about half the price which will be about 80% of the quality, if you have one of the "0", D40, D60 etc range then it is the perfect lens.
If you are looking at a D200 or D300 which are pro camera's then you should be looking at pro level glass, otherwise you are wasting your money on the pro level camera as the better results it can produce over the "0" range camera's is lost by using the lesser quality glass.
If you wanna spend money spend it on the glass as that is what will give you the better results not the body.
|
Kit 1 Canon 1D Mark 3 Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II |
Kit 2 1D2 & 40D |