 Senior Member
 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South East
Posts: 1,753
|
Wonderful shots DJ! Especially the top one 
When you get some time, would you be able to do a comparison review of the 50D and the 5D Mark II (or just your thoughts on the two of them would be great
What ISO and shutter speed did you use on these shots?
When you get some time, would you be able to do a comparison review of the 50D and the 5D Mark II (or just your thoughts on the two of them would be great
What ISO and shutter speed did you use on these shots?
|
Kit 1 Canon 20D Canon 28-135 3.5-5.6 IS USM Canon 70-300 4-5.6 IS USM Canon 100 2.8 USM Macro Canon 10-22mm 3.5-4.5 Canon 50mm 1.4 Canon 85mm 1.8 |
Other Kit View my profile to see my other kit! |
|
My Compact/P&S: Canon Ixus V3 |
|
Member
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wigan, UK
Posts: 67
|
These shots are amazing, wolves are such amazing creatures and you have captured them well
 Senior Member
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,880
|
 Senior Member
 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Glasgow, UK
Posts: 1,608
|
Thanks for the comments everyone
Thanks Gh. The shooting details were
#1 1/1600sec, ISO 320 and f5.6
#2 1/2000sec ISO 320 and f5.6
#3 1/2000sec ISO 320 and f5.6
My thoughts just now on 50d Vs 5dMKII is that the 50d is a sports/wildlife shooter and the 5d is the ultimate landscaper
The 50d is a great allrounder and can produce quality results whatever you use it for - wildlife-birds and landscapes. There is a problem though when shooting above f8 for landscapes, as diffraction creeps in, which will cause a softness in images. especially near the edge, which I have noticed. However, I have shot many landscape images above f8 with the 50d and while you can notice a little softness (if you are really pixel peeping at near 100% mag) around the edges, overall, they are still excellent images IMO.
Having used the 5d MKII for only a few days i'm blown away with the IQ and detail at 100%, it's an amazing camera. I'll still keep my 50d with 400mm attached for wildlife shots, as they both produce excellent images
Here is another shot of the Wolves taken with the 5dmkii and my 70-200mm
(1/1600sec @ f4.0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyhawk
Wonderful shots DJ! Especially the top one
When you get some time, would you be able to do a comparison review of the 50D and the 5D Mark II (or just your thoughts on the two of them would be great
What ISO and shutter speed did you use on these shots?
When you get some time, would you be able to do a comparison review of the 50D and the 5D Mark II (or just your thoughts on the two of them would be great
What ISO and shutter speed did you use on these shots?
#1 1/1600sec, ISO 320 and f5.6
#2 1/2000sec ISO 320 and f5.6
#3 1/2000sec ISO 320 and f5.6
My thoughts just now on 50d Vs 5dMKII is that the 50d is a sports/wildlife shooter and the 5d is the ultimate landscaper
The 50d is a great allrounder and can produce quality results whatever you use it for - wildlife-birds and landscapes. There is a problem though when shooting above f8 for landscapes, as diffraction creeps in, which will cause a softness in images. especially near the edge, which I have noticed. However, I have shot many landscape images above f8 with the 50d and while you can notice a little softness (if you are really pixel peeping at near 100% mag) around the edges, overall, they are still excellent images IMO.
Having used the 5d MKII for only a few days i'm blown away with the IQ and detail at 100%, it's an amazing camera. I'll still keep my 50d with 400mm attached for wildlife shots, as they both produce excellent images
Here is another shot of the Wolves taken with the 5dmkii and my 70-200mm
(1/1600sec @ f4.0)
|
Kit 1 Canon 5D MKII Canon 400mm f5.6 L Canon 70-200mm f4.0 L Canon 17-40mm f4.0 L |
Kit 2 Canon 50d |
 Senior Member
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,631
|
My bro in law bought a 5D as he likes landscape photography.
 Senior Member
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portsmouth, Hants, England
Posts: 622
 |
Very nice,
The one thing that stands out for me is that none of the high spots (the white parts) are over exposed, something that is tricky when photographing white fur on animals that are many shades.
Nice set of images.
Alan.
The one thing that stands out for me is that none of the high spots (the white parts) are over exposed, something that is tricky when photographing white fur on animals that are many shades.
Nice set of images.
Alan.
|
Kit 1 Canon 5D Mk11 EF 85mm F1.2 L EF 17-40 F4 L EF 100-400 F4.5-F5.6 L EF 50mm F1.8 Sigma F2.8 28-70mm |
Kit 2 Canon EOS 30D EF-S 18-55mm EF 35-105mm EF 70-300 |
Other Kit View my profile to see my other kit! |
 Member
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northumberland U.K
Posts: 46
|
Brill photos, i love wolfs
Is this place in scotland? as i would love to go there myself
Is this place in scotland? as i would love to go there myself
|
Kit 1 Sony A200 Sony 18 x 70 Sony 75 x300 |
|
|
My Compact/P&S: Kodak easyshare Z740 |
