Yo Photographer
Register for FREE!
Azz's Avatar
Azz
Admin Team
Azz is offline
Azz is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 15,385
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
07-08-09, 09:16 PM
#1

How many megapixels would be enough for you?

I know we say megapixels are not all that - but, how many would you actually like
Kit 1
Nikon D300
Nikon 55-200mm VR
Kit 2
Nikon D40
Nikon 18-55mm
My Compact/P&S: Panasonic Lumix TZ7


     
Tassle's Avatar
Tassle
Senior Member
Tassle is offline
Tassle is Female
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Truro, Cornwall UK
Posts: 939
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
07-08-09, 09:28 PM
#2

Re: How many megapixels would be enough for you?

Well - we have 14.2 on th a350, and I am quite happy with that....but I am looking to upgrade to the a700 (5fps instead of 3fps) I didn't look at the mp to be honest, but I did notice the a900 has 24mp!
Kit 1
Sony a700
Sigma 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3
My Compact/P&S: Sony DSC-W35


     
Jack Russell
Senior Member
Jack Russell is offline
Jack Russell is Male
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kolossi, Cyprus
Posts: 1,554
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
07-08-09, 10:28 PM
#3

Re: How many megapixels would be enough for you?

its all relative to the size of the sensor and what type of sensor it is. So pixels don't matter unless in the right configuration to the sensor used. It's that simple? No, no really, there are many other variables to consider.


     
SteveL's Avatar
SteveL
Senior Member
SteveL is offline
SteveL is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 984
Comments/Critique welcome
 
08-08-09, 01:06 AM
#4

Re: How many megapixels would be enough for you?

A very good example of the problem with megpixal chase is the Canon 40D & 50D. the canon 50D has a greater megapixal count than the 40D but the noise shown in the image is less in the images taken with the 40D than the 50D.

So the chase for megapixals can, and does, result in more noise.

BUT go to FF and the 21 megapixals are spread over a far greater area and therefore have to be amplified less resulting in less noise.

So my answer to the question would be, depends on the size of the sensor.

Steve
Kit 1
Canon 5D MkII
Canon24-105mm f4L IS USM
Canon 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Canon 17-40mm f4L USM
Canon 100mm f2.8 USM Macro
Canon 70-200 f4L USM
Canon MT-24EX Macro Flash
Kit 2
Canon 5D, Canon 40D, Canon 20D
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!


     
Zoundz's Avatar
Zoundz
Senior Member
Zoundz is offline
Zoundz is Female
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: West Cork, Ireland
Posts: 7,578
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
08-08-09, 01:50 AM
#5

Re: How many megapixels would be enough for you?

Agree with the above - If I'm being silly though - I would like one of these - so it's not good at high ISO - but damn it takes some good photos <3:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...nnounced.shtml
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...us-field.shtml

Oh yes I would. With one of these (to make the fabulousness above even better! ):
http://www.mamiya.com/products/default.asp?ID=34

Of course, that's just being an idiot - because I will *never* have that sort of money to spend on photography, unless I become the next Annie Liebovitz or Nigel Barker perhaps

Sooo... being realistic - I would like an upgrade on the D700 - and for it to have about 15-20 MP. I'm happy with that, that's as many as anyone needs really. The main thing is, it depends on the sensor.

xx
Kit 1
Nikon D800
Nikkor 50mm f1.4
Nikkor 24-70mm f2.8
Nikkor 105 mm f2.8 macro
Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8
Sigma 50-500mm F4-6.3 EX DG HSM
Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Nikon 70-300mm AF f/4-5.6G
Nikon 50mm f1.8
Kit 2
Nikon D700
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Fuji finepix bridge


     
Mahooli's Avatar
Mahooli
Senior Member
Mahooli is offline
Mahooli is Female
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 205
 
08-08-09, 08:02 AM
#6

Re: How many megapixels would be enough for you?

I don't really understand what this pixel thing actually means lol! Can someone explain please
Becky
Kit 1
Canon 350D
Canon EFS 18-55mm
Canon 75-300mm
Canon Macro Lens EFS 60mm
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!


     
BlackCloud's Avatar
BlackCloud
Senior Member
BlackCloud is offline
BlackCloud is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Posts: 2,133
Comments/Critique welcome
 
08-08-09, 08:51 AM
#7

Re: How many megapixels would be enough for you?

Pixels are the receptors of light, the tiniest elements of a picture. The sensor of a camera has millions of them all recieving individual light values as focussed on it by the lens. So effectively the picture the camera sees is focussed on the millions of pixels and the camera stores all the individual bits of information each pixel tells it it has.

Early digital cameras had maybe .5 million, then 1 million, now most compact cameras have around 8 million, many digital SLR's have 10, or even up to 24 million. Generally the more megapixels you would argue the camera is capable of resolving finer detail, i.e. more pixels packed into the same surface area you would get finer detail as the pixels would be smaller. However it's not as straightforward as that, smaller pixels bring their own set of issues, usually something called 'image noise', and the overall sensor size makes a big difference. So, as an example, 12 million pixels crammed into a 'half frame' sensor may not perform as well as 12 million pixels in a 'full frame' sensor i.e. a larger area. Again there are issues as increased pixel density can also have advantages.

Megapixels aren't everything, if it was you still wouldn't be seeing professionals happily walking around with aged Nikons like the D2H/D2X etc. and these are still sought after cameras. You will find people quite happily making A3 prints off these cameras and selling them for library and newpaper work and would sooner have them than a D300. These are people that make their livelihood from photography. At the end of the day it's what suits your need, what you are happy with. I was considering a change to a D700 but it's not for resolution or more megapixels. However, I wouldn't really want to change and find I was already outdated as such. The 24MP sensors are catching on and the new 5D seems to be setting a standard and noticeably better resolution (and maybe quality, but I am not saying that) over the D700.
Kit 1
Nikon D700
Nikon 28-70 f2.8 ED AF-S (The Beast)
Nikon 80-200mm f2.8
Tamron 24-135 SP
Nikon 300mm f4
Nikon 70-300mm VR
Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 (DX)
Nikon 28-105mm (great walkaround on D700!)
Lensbaby Composer
Nikon 20-35mm f2.8
Nikon SB800
Kit 2
Nikon D300
Nikon 20mm f2.8
Nikon 24mm f2.8
Nikon 28mm f2.8
Nikon 35mm f2
Nikon 50mm f1.4
Nikon 85mm f1.8
Micro-Nikon 60mm f2.8
Micro-Nikon 105mm f2.8
Tamron 28-75mm f2.8


     
NikoSnap's Avatar
NikoSnap
Senior Member
NikoSnap is offline
NikoSnap is Male
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 535
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
08-08-09, 09:08 AM
#8

Re: How many megapixels would be enough for you?

This is the very first digital image I snapped with one of the first digital cameras available (Kodak DC210) Only 1.3 megapixels
Kit 1
Panasonic Lumix G5
Panasonic 14-140mm
Panasonic 100-300mm
Panasonic Leica DG 25mm f1.4
Raynox DCR-250 Super Macro
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!


     
Phil's Avatar
Phil
Fondly Remembered
Phil is offline
Phil is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perthshire Scotland
Posts: 8,168
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
08-08-09, 10:15 AM
#9

Re: How many megapixels would be enough for you?

A similar thread from Oct 2007

http://www.yophotographer.com/page.p...ht=mega+pixels

To answer the question though - I'm more that happy with what my 40d produces.

Perhaps I should have included this in the post about 'full frame' DSLRs but I thought it worthy of it's own thread as it was a good example of why more mega pixels isn't always best.

The new Canon EOS 1DS MarkIII is a mind blowing 21MP and about £6500

I was one of those folk that subscribed to the more MP the better however having spoken to a Pro photographer friend of mine (and then seen this article) I thought it worth a mention.

Quote from the mag.....

"A benefit of having fewer megapixels is the increase space available for each pixel on the sensor. Each 'light well' (whatever they are) can collect much more light which will result in much better low light performance.

So - it's horses for courses I guess but it's nice to be told that sometimes less (cost) can be just as good for certain things.
Kit 1
Canon 1D Mark 3
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Kit 2
1D2 & 40D


     
WildWalker's Avatar
WildWalker
Senior Member
WildWalker is offline
WildWalker is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portsmouth, Hants, England
Posts: 622
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
08-08-09, 06:49 PM
#10

Re: How many megapixels would be enough for you?

When DSLR's got to 6 MegaPixels I think we achieved an equivalence with 35mm Film in terms of resolution (although Dynamic Range still has a way to go)

I upgraded from my 300D to my 30D purely for three reasons.

1. Functions, they left a lot of stuff out of the 300D.
2. Speed, man the 300D was slow, zooming in photos was sooo slow, and after taking 4 or 5 images you would have to wait a while to shoot again
3. Screen Size.

Increased MP was not an issue. When I upgraded to the 5DMk11, again it was really for one reason, Full Frame, it's cheaper to upgrade to a FF body than it is to buy stupidy wide lenses

Again, MP was not an issue. For most people, 6-8 MP is more than enough, and with modern printing techniques you can still print bigger than you are probably going to need.

An DSLR you buy now will almost certainly have more MP than you probably need, so don't go buying x over y just because of MP count.

Alan.
Kit 1
Canon 5D Mk11
EF 85mm F1.2 L
EF 17-40 F4 L
EF 100-400 F4.5-F5.6 L
EF 50mm F1.8
Sigma F2.8 28-70mm
Kit 2
Canon EOS 30D
EF-S 18-55mm
EF 35-105mm
EF 70-300
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!


     
Reply

Top


© Copyright 2008, Yo Photographer   Yo Photographer | Contact Us | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top