Yo Photographer
Register for FREE!
Go Back   Photography Forum > General Photography Forums > Photography Talk


Log-in/register to unlock all the member quick-links and features!
Reply
Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 > Last »


Jack Russell
Senior Member
Jack Russell is offline
Jack Russell is Male
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kolossi, Cyprus
Posts: 1,554
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
24-10-08, 11:26 PM
#21

Re: How good is Adobe software?

RAW for me for all of the positive reasons already outlined. JPEG has it's place - for posting to t'internet, or 'quick' saves where quality doesnt matter.

I have done a Military Photographers course and as a rule the military capture EVERYTHING in RAW & JPEG for quick reference copies.

Each job assignment is then saved in a job folder containing the original RAW files in a RAW folder and a JPEG folder and a Edit folder containing any edited images. Each image is also catalogued with the fog's name, date/time, Job reference number & the file refence number. This is then backed-up to CD and HDD.

To return to the original question - how good is Adobe Software? Assuming it is Abode CS3/Abode Bridge/ImageReady - personally, I dont think it is rivalled, as yet.


     
BlackCloud's Avatar
BlackCloud
Senior Member
BlackCloud is offline
BlackCloud is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Posts: 2,133
Comments/Critique welcome
 
25-10-08, 12:18 AM
#22

Re: How good is Adobe software?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Russell View Post
To return to the original question - how good is Adobe Software? Assuming it is Abode CS3/Abode Bridge/ImageReady - personally, I dont think it is rivalled, as yet.
It's not, as you know, it's no question, it's seen as an industry standard as are lossless formats by those who do it and rely on it for a living...
Kit 1
Nikon D700
Nikon 28-70 f2.8 ED AF-S (The Beast)
Nikon 80-200mm f2.8
Tamron 24-135 SP
Nikon 300mm f4
Nikon 70-300mm VR
Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 (DX)
Nikon 28-105mm (great walkaround on D700!)
Lensbaby Composer
Nikon 20-35mm f2.8
Nikon SB800
Kit 2
Nikon D300
Nikon 20mm f2.8
Nikon 24mm f2.8
Nikon 28mm f2.8
Nikon 35mm f2
Nikon 50mm f1.4
Nikon 85mm f1.8
Micro-Nikon 60mm f2.8
Micro-Nikon 105mm f2.8
Tamron 28-75mm f2.8


     
Stanokella's Avatar
Stanokella
Senior Member
Stanokella is offline
Stanokella is Male
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,419
Comments/Critique welcome
 
25-10-08, 12:55 AM
#23

Re: How good is Adobe software?

jpeg is a lossy format, that is what it is for to reduce file size.

The quality of a fine jpeg and a RAW file are very similar with very little difference and certainly no difference at normal magnification and print sizes.

Not all people use RAW who earn a living from photography, think you'll find a large proportion of togs use jpeg, particularly sports photographers.
Kit 1
Nikon D700
Nikon MB-D10 Battery Grip
Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8
Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8
Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 VR
Nikon micro AF 200mm f/4
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Fuji X100


     
SteveL's Avatar
SteveL
Senior Member
SteveL is offline
SteveL is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 984
Comments/Critique welcome
 
25-10-08, 01:21 AM
#24

Re: How good is Adobe software?

It's horses for courses really. Only the individual can decide which is best for them.

Sports togs? What is their main market? Newspapers. One does not need a lot of quality to print an image in a newspaper so Jpg's are fine.

Try filling a double page magazine with a a jpg and you may find that is a different matter.

From my point of view I have to cater for the customer who requires 10 x 8 inch prints which jpeg could handle fine, to the customer who requires 20 x 16 inch print which a jpg will not do. Not to the standard I would expect to deliver to a customer.

Why do libraries such as Alamy advise to shoot in raw, develop in whatever program and then up res to a minimum of 48mb and then convert to jpg with a minimum quality of 10 which is minimal compression.

Try up ressing a jpeg image from a camera to 50mb and tell me there is no difference from a raw image upressed the same amount.

Don't get me wrong, I am not anti jpg but it must be recognised that in the compression information IS lost and can never be regained even if you convert that jpg to a tiff.

I paid a lot of money for my full frame 5D so why should I not strive to get ALL the information captured by that sensor rather than chuck some of it away?

Steve
Kit 1
Canon 5D MkII
Canon24-105mm f4L IS USM
Canon 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Canon 17-40mm f4L USM
Canon 100mm f2.8 USM Macro
Canon 70-200 f4L USM
Canon MT-24EX Macro Flash
Kit 2
Canon 5D, Canon 40D, Canon 20D
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!


     
Phil's Avatar
Phil
Fondly Remembered
Phil is offline
Phil is Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perthshire Scotland
Posts: 8,168
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
25-10-08, 01:54 AM
#25

Re: How good is Adobe software?

I only tend to print up to A4 or just enjoy pics on screen so I tend to shoot 'best' Jpg.

There's no doubt RAW is best because it enables me to do more with the file but in the end the Raw file will still end up as a Jpg.

I look forward to the day I can come home with just 20 Raw images but I'm like most folk - I come home with 200 Jpgs which would take an age to evaluate if they were RAW.
Kit 1
Canon 1D Mark 3
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Kit 2
1D2 & 40D


     
Jack Russell
Senior Member
Jack Russell is offline
Jack Russell is Male
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kolossi, Cyprus
Posts: 1,554
Comments/Critique welcome You may edit and repost my images but ONLY on this site
 
25-10-08, 09:19 AM
#26

Re: How good is Adobe software?

Why would 'evaluating' RAW files take any longer then 'evaluating' a similar number of JPEG files? RAW files are ready for use in the same way JPEGS are directly from camera.

One thing that hasnt been mentioned thus far in this thread is that JPEGs lose data, and consequently, quality, each time they are edited and resaved - that is not the case with RAW.

Like Steve has said, it's horses for courses - me? I prefer to shoot and edit in RAW and output accordingly. If I were to advise a novice photographer I would always say shoot in RAW, and convert as necessary. Not only the better quality RAW (no pun intend) material, the novice could learn a huge amount about photography from histogram information and other RAW data information.

Using JPEG as an exclusive means with a modern DSLR is like owning a thoroughbred racehorse, yet riding a donkey to work.


     
BlackCloud's Avatar
BlackCloud
Senior Member
BlackCloud is offline
BlackCloud is Male
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Posts: 2,133
Comments/Critique welcome
 
25-10-08, 09:30 AM
#27

Re: How good is Adobe software?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanokella View Post
jpeg is a lossy format, that is what it is for to reduce file size.

The quality of a fine jpeg and a RAW file are very similar with very little difference and certainly no difference at normal magnification and print sizes.

Not all people use RAW who earn a living from photography, think you'll find a large proportion of togs use jpeg, particularly sports photographers.
...I was refering really to maintaining an utmost quality image but yes I know there are many exceptions and that jpg is far more convenient and suitable in many situations. Additionally there are reasons why a quality image would be desirable, has to be maintained but compressed and compromised to acceptable jpg, data transmission for example. I'm getting bored now...!
Kit 1
Nikon D700
Nikon 28-70 f2.8 ED AF-S (The Beast)
Nikon 80-200mm f2.8
Tamron 24-135 SP
Nikon 300mm f4
Nikon 70-300mm VR
Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 (DX)
Nikon 28-105mm (great walkaround on D700!)
Lensbaby Composer
Nikon 20-35mm f2.8
Nikon SB800
Kit 2
Nikon D300
Nikon 20mm f2.8
Nikon 24mm f2.8
Nikon 28mm f2.8
Nikon 35mm f2
Nikon 50mm f1.4
Nikon 85mm f1.8
Micro-Nikon 60mm f2.8
Micro-Nikon 105mm f2.8
Tamron 28-75mm f2.8


     
Stanokella's Avatar
Stanokella
Senior Member
Stanokella is offline
Stanokella is Male
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,419
Comments/Critique welcome
 
25-10-08, 10:59 AM
#28

Re: How good is Adobe software?

To say that you can't print from a jpeg upto 20x16 and achieve a quality print simply isn't true. I do it on a regular basis, I'm a member of a photographic society and enter competitions on with prints that have to be that size. My prints are of no lower quality that the other prints in the competitions that may or may not have been made from a RAW file.


As for an analogy of a dslr being a race horse, I'd liken the use of RAW to modifying your car. Adding a new exhaust, re-mapping and all the other tweaks and having them activated by a switch. With jpeg the switch is on with RAW the switch is off and your only getting the basic out of the car without the extra power.

Telling a beginner to shoot RAW is guaranteed to get them to put their dslr back in the box and get out the p&s again. Shooting in RAW requires a lot more work to end up with a finished image and one that you are happy with, having to do double processing on a pic before it starts to look right is going to do nothing other than frustrate and depress a beginner.
Kit 1
Nikon D700
Nikon MB-D10 Battery Grip
Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8
Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8
Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 VR
Nikon micro AF 200mm f/4
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Fuji X100


     
Moonstone
Senior Member
Moonstone is offline
Moonstone is Female
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: uk/usa
Posts: 10,146
 
25-10-08, 11:11 AM
#29

Re: How good is Adobe software?

I think this debate could go on for awhile.

TBH I would of thought all pros would of shot in RAW what happens if they **** up, as they are only human, have the wrong settings etc. At least with RAW they would be able to salvage something, with JPEG they'd be f*****.

Of course, as a beginner I am talking out of my bum probablly.

Wasn't this thread about Photo shop?

Well, I love Photo shop !


     
Stanokella's Avatar
Stanokella
Senior Member
Stanokella is offline
Stanokella is Male
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,419
Comments/Critique welcome
 
25-10-08, 11:18 AM
#30

Re: How good is Adobe software?

If they are a pro they they shouldn't really be getting wrong, for sports with the frame rate and the write speed to the card RAW could cause a lot of shots to be missed when the camera hits its memory buffer.
Kit 1
Nikon D700
Nikon MB-D10 Battery Grip
Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8
Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8
Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 VR
Nikon micro AF 200mm f/4
Other Kit
View my profile to see my other kit!
My Compact/P&S: Fuji X100


     
Reply
Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 > Last »

Top


© Copyright 2008, Yo Photographer   Yo Photographer | Contact Us | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top